Minneapolis Revises Abortion Clinic Law Amid Free Speech Debate

The article “Minneapolis Softens Law on Obstructing Abortion Clinics in Response to Free-Speech Lawsuit” highlights changes to a Minneapolis ordinance following a lawsuit by anti-abortion activists.

Key Points

  • Ordinance Amendment
    The Minneapolis City Council revised its ordinance to exclude constitutionally protected activities, ensuring alignment with free speech rights. The amendment retains prohibitions against physically obstructing clinic entrances.
  • Legal Settlement
    The city agreed to cover the plaintiffs’ legal fees, acknowledging the importance of protecting constitutional freedoms.
  • Plaintiffs’ Perspective
    Pro-Life Action Ministries, known for dispatching “sidewalk counselors” to clinics, argued that the original ordinance infringed on their free speech rights by restricting their ability to engage with individuals entering the clinics.
  • City’s Stance
    City officials stated that the amendment ensures the ordinance complies with the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, balancing healthcare access with constitutional rights.
  • Ongoing Legal Actions
    The Thomas More Society, representing the plaintiffs, continues to challenge similar laws nationwide, advocating for free speech rights in the context of abortion clinic access.

This development highlights the broader national debate over the balance between healthcare access and free speech rights.

For more details, read the full article here: Minneapolis Softens Law on Obstructing Abortion Clinics in Response to Free-Speech Lawsuit

Posted in